Official Forum for Esamir, a Nationstates Region.


    (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Share
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Sat Oct 03, 2015 8:35 pm

    RESOLUTION FOR THE RESTORATION OF PEACE IN CHACKLE
    Authored by the Federal Aristocratic Kingdom of New Tarajan, on behalf of all members of OMNI Enforcer


    The Security Council

    Having considered the immediate danger facing the population of the secessionist province of Oghon, which faces the threat of a complete genocide by the Chackleian regime,

    Concerned about the possible explosion of a conflict between Newellia and Chackle, which would greatly undermine world peace and stability,

    Believing that the possession, by the Chackleian regime, of any kind of Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD), is greatly concerning for all members of the International Community,

    1. Decides to establish the United Nations Peace Enforcing Force in Chackle (UNPEFC), as a military force devoted to achieve the following goals:

    1.1: The protection and safeguard of the life of civilians in the secessionist province of Oghon;
    1.2: The protection and safeguard of the life of the citizens of all neighbouring countries from threats coming from Chackle;
    1.3: The complete disarmament of the WMD arsenal actually belonging to Chackle;
    1.4: The enforcement of an armistice between Chackle and the secessionist province of Oghon, under the aegis of the UNE, and as a first step toward a peace treaty;

    2. Calls upon the International Court of Justice to investigate and eventually prosecute any violation of UNE Resolutions and International Laws eventually committed by Chackleian authorities since the establishment of the new regime.
    avatar
    Kaevi
    Ascendancy
    Ascendancy

    Posts : 335
    Join date : 2014-08-04

    Debate Period

    Post by Kaevi on Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:08 am

    The debate period has now started, ending on October 8, 2015, at 00:00 UTC.
    The author of this proposal may petition to the Secretary-General to end the debate.
    Votes will not be counted during this time.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:42 am

    Eurasia is concerned about the passages regarding confiscation of WMD's by the UNEPF. While Eurasia doesn't necessarily support Chackle possessing WMD's, there is no law stating they cannot possess them, and confiscation by the UNEPF would be a serious breach of sovereignty. Instead, Eurasia proposes we institute a buy-back program, to incentivize the Chacklian Regime to dismantle their weapons instead of taking them by force.
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:18 am

    Are you suggesting to propose t obuy its WMD?
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:26 am

    If this resolution is contingent on the removal of WMD's, then yes, unless New Tarajan sees a viable alternative. If it is not contingent on removal of WMD's, then we see no reason to keep the passage in the resolution or to institute a buy-back program.
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:31 am

    In the actual situation, we believe that the possession of WMDs by the Chackle regime is very dangerous: they already threatened to use them against the population of Oghon, and we cannot know when and where they will be eventually used even against other members of the International Community. This is the reason why we implemented that passage.

    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:35 am

    Eurasia agrees that Chacklian possession of WMD's is dangerous, however we do not believe that the SC has the authority to unilaterally confiscate them on perceived threats to the Oghonese people. Eurasia would prefer that this be done by the ICOJ after an investigation.
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:51 am

    In theory, we perfectly agree with your position.
    The only problem is that we cannot risk that Chackle could use the WMDs while the investigation is on-going: we need to find a suitable solution.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 3:58 am

    New Tarajan wrote:In theory, we perfectly agree with your position.
    The only problem is that we cannot risk that Chackle could use the WMDs while the investigation is on-going: we need to find a suitable solution.

    How can we assure they won't use them while we are trying to confiscate them?
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:23 am

    The confiscation will be far more rapid than an investifation. That's obvious.
    But we are open to any suggestion.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:27 am

    New Tarajan wrote:The confiscation will be far more rapid than an investifation. That's obvious.
    But we are open to any suggestion.

    We believe that the Chacklian Government will choose self-preservation over annihilation, thus an investigation, in our opinion, is best.
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:28 am

    What is the opinion of the other members?
    avatar
    Kaevi
    Ascendancy
    Ascendancy

    Posts : 335
    Join date : 2014-08-04

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Kaevi on Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:35 am

    We could always invite Chackle to speak to the Security Council to find a solution that would be most suitable for everyone.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:25 am

    We agree.
    avatar
    Zackalantis
    Common State
    Common State

    Posts : 359
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 20
    Location : Mumbai,Maharashtra,India

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Zackalantis on Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:40 am

    As a member of the GA the UKZ has the right to participate in this discussion without vote.

    As much as we would like to see the confiscation of Chackle's WMDs the Security Council has no right to do so.
    It is not illegal for Chackle to have WMDs.

    We do understand that WMDs in the hands of the Chackle leadership is dangerous to all of us in the international community.
    Therefore reqquesting Chackle presence at the SC, would be the best decision the honorable members of the SC could take.

    Furthermore, it is no secret that the Chackle Leadership is responsible for grave war crimes and therefore should be tried before the criminal bench of the ECJ just like the Queen of Khanate was.

    The UKZ thanks the honorable members of the Security Council for their attention and consideration of the points raised by us.
    avatar
    Kaevi
    Ascendancy
    Ascendancy

    Posts : 335
    Join date : 2014-08-04

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Kaevi on Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:45 am

    Zackalantis wrote:As a member of the GA the UKZ has the right to participate in this discussion without vote.

    As much as we would like to see the confiscation of Chackle's WMDs the Security Council has no right to do so.
    It is not illegal for Chackle to have WMDs.

    We do understand that WMDs in the hands of the Chackle leadership is dangerous to all of us in the international community.
    Therefore reqquesting Chackle presence at the SC, would be the best decision the honorable members of the SC could take.

    Furthermore, it is no secret that the Chackle Leadership is responsible for grave war crimes and therefore should be tried before the criminal bench of the ECJ just like the Queen of Khanate was.

    The UKZ thanks the honorable members of the Security Council for their attention and consideration of the points raised by us.

    I'm glad UKZ brought this up. UKZ is correct that the ownership of WMDs is not a crime, but their effects are. As strange as this sounds, Chackle can theoretically threaten anyone however much he pleases.

    I have heard that Chackle is interested in giving Oghon semi or full autonomy. If Oghon is given independence, I propose that it be under direct control of the UNE government to prevent another messy land split up like what happened with the Khanate.
    avatar
    Zackalantis
    Common State
    Common State

    Posts : 359
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 20
    Location : Mumbai,Maharashtra,India

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Zackalantis on Sun Oct 04, 2015 4:38 pm

    UKZ agrees to what Kaevi said.
    This partion of Chackle should be overseen by a neutral body.

    I therefore propose the creation of The Chackle Partition Committee (CPC)
    The CPC could be under the age is of the UNE and consist of members of the security coumcil, Chackle, Oghon, and a few other GA members.

    Also the Chackle leadership must answer for war crimes.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:54 am

    Eurasia can confirm that should this resolution pass the ICoJ will undertake actions against Chackle.
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:16 am

    We agree to hear from the Chackleian delegation, but we will not wait so much, since time is essential.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:33 am

    Eurasia suggests that if we do not hear from the Chacklian delegation in 24 hours we proceed with a vote.
    avatar
    Duresia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 146
    Join date : 2014-08-05
    Age : 23
    Location : Göteborg, Sweden

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Duresia on Mon Oct 05, 2015 4:17 am

    Eurasia wrote:Eurasia suggests that if we do not hear from the Chacklian delegation in 24 hours we proceed with a vote.

    Duresia agrees.
    avatar
    New Tarajan
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 533
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 25
    Location : Rome

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by New Tarajan on Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:54 am

    We agree.
    avatar
    Kaevi
    Ascendancy
    Ascendancy

    Posts : 335
    Join date : 2014-08-04

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Kaevi on Wed Oct 07, 2015 6:33 am

    Seeing as Chackle has yet to appear and that 24 hours have passed, the Speaker invites the author to request an end to the debate period.
    avatar
    Kaevi
    Ascendancy
    Ascendancy

    Posts : 335
    Join date : 2014-08-04

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Kaevi on Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:50 am

    The debate period has ended and the voting period has now begun, ending on October 11, 2015, at 00:00 UTC.
    Nations may cast a vote in favor, against, or abstention.
    Votes of abstention will be counted as votes in favor.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 992
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Eurasia on Fri Oct 09, 2015 12:51 am

    AGAINST

    Sponsored content

    Re: (P(I)) Resolution for the Restoration of Peace in Chackle

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Jun 29, 2017 11:15 am