Official Forum for Esamir, a Nationstates Region.


    Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Share
    avatar
    Zackalantis
    Common State
    Common State

    Posts : 373
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 20
    Location : Mumbai,Maharashtra,India

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Zackalantis on Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:11 pm

    The plaintiff needs to understand that we are simply voicing our opinions to the Chief Justice as he called these nations neutral, we are pointing out why they are not actually neutral in this case.

    So we merely suggested something to the court as a compromise. Indeed we trust the court and will accept whatever decision it makes.
    avatar
    Duresia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 146
    Join date : 2014-08-05
    Age : 23
    Location : Göteborg, Sweden

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Duresia on Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:50 pm

    http://esamirforum.forumotion.net/t220p225-esamir-international-news-network#6613

    Proof of Zackalantis contaminating waters outside of Aismark and parts of Aismark territory, to those that don't know, Aismark is a quite big island northeast of Zackalantis.
    avatar
    Zackalantis
    Common State
    Common State

    Posts : 373
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 20
    Location : Mumbai,Maharashtra,India

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Zackalantis on Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:59 pm

    We would like to point out that the Duresian findings are in correlation to Zack Findings. The UKZ found near contamination but those levels are too low to cause any harm to any form of life and are naturally occurring throughout the world's oceans due to the presence of past nuclear tests or naturally occurring radioactive material.

    We know for a fact that this hasn't posed any danger to life because the fisheries on the northern coast of the UKZ have not reported any contamination of fish or dead fish.

    We thank the Duresian team for supporting our claims.
    avatar
    Duresia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 146
    Join date : 2014-08-05
    Age : 23
    Location : Göteborg, Sweden

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Duresia on Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:17 pm

    We'd like to say that while the levels aren't extremly high no, the radioactive levels are still worrying. Also that discredits the Tajarani and Antanaresian investigations that claim that there is no contamination.

    As for the level of harm those radioactive levels may pose, the water will get better over time, but the radioactivity in the forests, mostly the ones with medium levels of contamination will remain so for many years. As some may know, a forest that absorbed radioactivity will remain radioactive for a very long time, and some of the forests may need to be bulldozed to prevent the possibility of unknowing tourists or even locals wandering into them.
    avatar
    Zackalantis
    Common State
    Common State

    Posts : 373
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 20
    Location : Mumbai,Maharashtra,India

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Zackalantis on Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:22 pm

    The contamination is low. It doesn't not pose any threat to life. The Tarajani and Antanresian scientists may have looked over the levels of radiation that are not dangerous and hence stated 0 levels of radiation.

    As the amounts of radiation present in the ocean (from source not yet proven) is not enough to pose any threat to life therefore the radiation in the forests should also not have any dire effects on life. There is no need to bulldoze those forests.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 995
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Eurasia on Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:22 pm

    Firstly, the Court would like to thank Associate Justice Duresia for their evidence provided.

    Secondly, the Court would also like to thank Associate Justice New Tarajan for their concern regarding the Court's request for evidence. The Court recognizes these concerns as valid, and as such will now close oral debate and move towards the closed voting on the matter. The Court thusly will not accept information provided by either ICFS (Terran Federation) or OMNI sources, apart from that provided by those party to this case. Thus, the evidence providing by the following nations will be accepted: Kaevi, UKZ, Duresia.

    Debate is now closed. Any posts made here will not be considered.
    avatar
    Eurasia
    Supremacy
    Supremacy

    Posts : 995
    Join date : 2014-08-03
    Age : 42
    Location : Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Eurasia on Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:53 am

    VERDICT


    The Court rules in favor of the plaintiff, Kaevi, and finds the defendant, Zackalantis, guilty of contaminating international waters through nuclear tests. As such, the Court levies against the defendant the following:



    1. Payment to the plaintiff of a sum of 40 million Kaevise Ronan's
    2. Payment of the plaintiff's legal fees
    3. Provision of an accurate and unabridged assessment of Zackalantis' nuclear capabilities, including the number of weapons, payload range, and if further construction is planned.



    Further, the Court requests assurance from the defendant that they shall not perform negligent tests of nuclear materials in the future.

    Lastly, the Court formally recommends and requests that the General Assembly undertake proposition of and voting on a resolution to ban the use of nuclear weapons in warfare and to ban their testing.

    The Court is adjourned.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Kaevi v. Zackalantis

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat Sep 23, 2017 6:17 pm